Home Projects · Startup costs
How much does it cost to install gutters?
Price your gutters by the foot, from the rate the trade actually bills rather than one we made up. And meet the classification nobody reports: the government files gutter contractors under Siding Contractors, in the same class, which is why gutters are a quarter of that class's work and only 2% of a roofer's.
Typical range $1,372 – $2,098
- Gutter material$640
- Labour, overhead and profit$974
- Gutter guards$0
- Total$1,614
§ 02 The return
The billed rate, the trade shares and the split of a job's dollar are all measured from the 2022 Economic Census, in 2025 dollars. The material price per foot is our model, because we could not find a free source that publishes one, and the assumptions name every place we looked. The measured material share is shown beside your result so you can see whether our assumptions are holding.
Where the money goes
Recommended next steps
Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them, Calcatrice may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only suggest tools that fit your result, and a company can't pay to show up here.
The ordinary range for a full house in aluminium. Three quotes, and remember that the siding contractors are the specialists here: gutters are a quarter of their business and 2% of a roofer's.
By the numbers
- NAICS 238170 is titled 'Siding contractors', and its own index lists, verbatim, 'Downspout, gutter, and gutter guard installation' and 'Gutter and downspout contractors'. The government files the two trades in one class. We originally told you there was no NAICS code for gutter contractors at all, which was false, and it was the fifth such claim we have got wrong.
- Economic Census (2022): employer firms did $4.20 billion of gutter, gutter guard and downspout work. That is not 'what Americans spent': the Economic Census counts only firms with employees, and a great many gutter outfits are one van and no payroll.
- 64% of that work went through the siding class and 33% through roofing contractors. Gutter work is 24.8% of the SIDING CLASS's receipts against 2.0% of the ROOFING class's. Read those as facts about the classes, not about individual firms: because NAICS files gutters-only specialists into the siding class, the class average is lifted by firms that do nothing else, and a typical siding contractor does less gutter work than 24.8%.
- What survives all that, and is the useful part: gutters are a CORE business for the siding class and a SIDELINE for roofers. The roofer quoting you for gutters is quoting for something that is 2% of what his industry does.
- Siding contractors bill $113.97 a field hour and roofers bill $136.72. Weighted by how much gutter work each actually performs, gutter labour bills $121.70 a field hour, against the $30.89 the firm pays the person up the ladder. A measured 3.94x markup, which is why labour and not aluminium is most of your bill.
- Economic Census: a gutter job's dollar splits roughly 40% materials and 60% labour, overhead and profit, once you drop the subcontract line that a gutter job never uses. On a 200 ft aluminium job that means the metal is about $640 of a $1,614 bill, and everything else is people, ladders, insurance and profit.
- Gutter guards are the industry's favourite upsell, and the branded micro-mesh systems sold door to door run $10 to $30 a foot fitted. On a 200 ft house that is $2,000 to $6,000, which can cost several times the gutters underneath them. Ask for the two priced separately, and be wary of anyone who will not.
- We could not find a free source publishing an installed gutter price per foot, and here is every place we looked: DOE's measures database (both workbooks, 93 sheets, no gutter line item anywhere); the Economic Census Kind of Business file (gutter receipts, but no quantities, so no route from $4.20bn to a price per foot); the Census Products-by-Industry tables for 2022, which publish dollars with no quantity column and so yield no unit price; and the federal producer price indexes, which give the change in price and never the level. If one exists, we have not found it and we would like to.
What is sourced, and what is ours. The rate is sourced and it is the spine of the page: the Economic Census measures what siding and roofing contractors bill per field hour, and its Kind of Business file measures how much gutter work each of them actually does, so we can weight the two and get a rate for gutter labour specifically rather than borrowing someone else's. The industry size and the trade shares are sourced from the same place. Ours is the material price per foot, and it carries most of the uncertainty. Two smaller things are ours as well and say so where they appear: the crew hours and the guard price. But the material rate is what moves the answer. We hunted before saying so, because a refusal is a claim and we have got four of them wrong. We checked DOE and NREL's measures database, both workbooks, all 93 sheets: its unit-cost tables cover siding, roof, duct and pipe insulation, and there is no gutter line item. We checked the Economic Census Kind of Business file, which gives gutter receipts but no quantities, so there is no way to get from $4.20bn to a price per foot. We checked the Economic Census manufacturing files, which publish no product-line quantities for 2022. And the federal price indexes are indexes: they can tell you gutters got dearer, never what gutters cost. If a free source publishes an installed gutter price, we have not found it, and we would like to. But we did not guess it either, and the honest version of this is better than the one we first wrote. The Economic Census measures how a job's dollar splits. Blended for the trades that hang gutters and renormalised over the two lines we actually model, it is 40.2% materials and 59.8% labour, overhead and profit. Given your crew hours and the measured billed rate, that split does not merely check the material price. It determines it. It pins it at $3.22 a foot, and $3.20 is that number rounded. We first called this a validation. It was not, and you should know why. It was circular: we fitted the price to hit the share and then announced that the share agreed, which is a parameter agreeing with its own definition. And it was backwards: the share is invariant to scaling the material price and the crew hours together, so doubling both leaves the gauge reading exactly the same while the total doubles. It catches the two drifting APART. It is blind to both being wrong in the same direction, which is precisely what we claimed it would catch. It is a ratio test, not a level test. Two things will move that gauge legitimately, so do not read them as failures. Copper takes the material share to about 84%, because copper is copper. And gutter guards take it past 70%, because a guard is almost pure material. Both are real changes of scope, not broken arithmetic. The gauge is a sanity test for an ordinary aluminium job and nothing more. And one thing we deliberately do not do. Every other home page here is anchored on what households told the American Housing Survey they paid. Not this one, because the survey never asks about gutters. We read the question wording: the nearest one asks about "any other part of the exterior of your home, such as chimney or stairs". A gutter job might land in that bucket, but so does a chimney rebuild, and its median is dominated by them. Borrowing it would be a lie with a citation attached.
Sources: US Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census, EC2223KOB (Kind of Business), code 8170: gutter, gutter guard and downspout installation contractor · US Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census, EC2223BASIC (the billed rates and the composition of a job's dollar) · US Census Bureau, AHS 2023 Items Booklet (the question wording showing the survey never asks about gutters) · BEA, residential improvements price index (deflator)
How this estimate is calculated
- The billed rate of $121.70 a field hour is MEASURED and specific to gutter work rather than borrowed from a neighbouring trade. The Economic Census gives the value of construction work each trade does and the field hours behind it, so we can compute what the siding class bills ($113.97) and what roofers bill ($136.72). Its Kind of Business file says the siding class does 64% of US gutter work and roofers 33%, with the remaining 3% spread across masons, framers and finish carpenters. We weight over just the two big trades, which means renormalising 64/33 to 66/34. That renormalisation is ours, and if you take the raw 64/33 straight off the page and do the arithmetic yourself you will get $117.80, not $121.70. It is a trade-wide average either way, not a quote for your job.
- The material price per foot is OUR MODEL and it carries most of the uncertainty here. Two smaller assumptions are ours too and are flagged where they appear: the crew hours and the guard price. We could not find a free source for an installed gutter price, and here is every place we looked: DOE and NREL's measures database (both workbooks, all 93 sheets, no gutter line item), the Economic Census Kind of Business file (receipts but no quantities, so no route from $4.20bn to a price per foot), the Economic Census manufacturing files (no product-line quantities published for 2022), and the BLS producer price indexes (which are indexes, and so give the change in price and never the level). If a free source does publish one, we have not found it and we want to know.
- The material price is not a free guess, and this is the most important thing to understand about the page. The Economic Census measures how a job's dollar splits: renormalised over the two lines we model, 40.2% materials and 59.8% labour, overhead and profit. Once you fix the crew hours and the measured billed rate, that split DETERMINES the material price. It pins it at $3.22 a foot, and $3.20 is that rounded. We did not pick it.
- We first presented the resulting agreement as a validation, and it was neither honest nor sound. It was CIRCULAR, because we had fitted the price to hit the share and then reported that the share agreed. And it was BACKWARDS: the share is invariant to scaling the material price and the crew hours together, so a 2x error in the total leaves the gauge reading identically. It detects the two drifting APART, and it is blind to both being wrong the same way, which is exactly the failure we told you it would catch. It is a ratio test, not a level test. The gauge is still worth showing, but only for what it can actually do.
- The renormalisation that drops the subcontract line is not a fudge, and it is worth being precise. The Census split has three parts (36.1% materials, 10.1% subcontracted, 53.8% labour). Our model has two, because a gutter job subs nothing out. Comparing a two-part share against a three-part share would be comparing different denominators, which is exactly the unit-of-analysis error this site exists to avoid. Renormalising over the two lines we model fixes the COMPARISON. It does not move the pin: the material-to-labour ratio is 0.672 either way.
- Eight crew hours is our default and it describes a straightforward job: a single-storey house, seamless aluminium, decent access, a simple roofline. Two storeys, awkward ground, fascia board that turns out to be rotten, or a roof with many corners will all push it up. Corners matter more than people expect, because every one is a mitre and mitres are where gutters leak.
- There is NO American Housing Survey anchor on this page, unlike every other home job we cover, and here is the precise reason. The survey never asks what a gutter job COST. We read the whole items booklet: the only place gutters appear in the entire instrument is an instruction to EXCLUDE them from a roof-condition question ('does the roof have missing shingles... do not count gutters or downspouts'). Which is a small, pleasing corroboration of the headline, incidentally: Census's own survey tells respondents that gutters are not roofing.
- The nearest cost question asks whether you added or replaced 'any other part of the exterior of your home, such as chimney or stairs'. A gutter job might be recorded there, alongside chimney rebuilds and new front steps. We CANNOT tell you what share of that bucket is gutters, because the survey records no sub-code and neither can Census. So we will not claim the bucket is 'dominated' by chimneys, which we originally did and could not support. We simply cannot use it, and we would rather leave a hole in the page than fill it with a number whose meaning we do not know.
- Gutter guard pricing is our assumption and it is the widest range on the page, deliberately. Simple mesh screens are a couple of dollars a foot. The branded micro-mesh systems sold at the door are routinely $10 to $30 a foot fitted, which on an average house costs more than the gutters. We default the guards to zero so that you are pricing gutters, and we would encourage you to make any contractor quote the two separately.
- The low and high band is our estimate of quote-to-quote spread (15% below and 30% above), not a measured figure. Access, roof height and the state of the fascia board are the things that move a real quote most, and none of them are visible from a length in feet.
