Calcatrice cockatrice logoCalcatrice.
Est. 2026
The ledger for
expensive decisions

Home Projects · Startup costs

How much does a heat pump cost to install and run?

Pick your state. A typical new heat pump is cheaper to run than a modern gas furnace in only 4 of the 43 states for which the government has published a 2025 gas price. In the other 39 it costs you more to run. Which side of the line your house falls on is decided by two numbers that are not on your quote: the price of electricity and the price of gas where you live.

More
Then read the next sentence, because it decides whether any of that applies to you. The finding above is about GAS. Piped gas heats 59.4 million American homes, so it is a lot of people, but it is not most people. Another 44.4 million homes heat with electricity and have no heat pump, which means resistance heat, and on RUNNING COST a heat pump beats that in every state: it is the same electricity and two to three times the heat. If that is you, the uncomfortable half of this page is not about you. The one honest caveat is that about 2.3 million of those 44.4 million heat with portable electric heaters, which means no ducts and possibly no panel for one, so the running-cost win is real but the capital cost is a different question and this page does not price it.

A typical new heat pump is cheaper to run than a modern gas furnace in only 4 of the 43 states for which the government has published a 2025 gas price. In the other 39 it costs you more to run. That is not an opinion and it is not a model: it falls straight out of EIA's own electricity and gas prices and the physics of the two machines.
More
Here is the arithmetic, and you can check it. A heat pump's running cost is electricity divided by its seasonal COP. A furnace's is gas divided by its efficiency. Set them equal and you get the COP a heat pump has to BEAT where you live: (electricity $/kWh / 3,412) x (0.95 x 100,000 / gas $/therm). In Florida that comes to 1.74, so almost any heat pump wins. In Michigan it is 5.67 and in Alaska 6.09, and nothing on the market gets close. A stronger machine does not fix it. A top-tier cold-climate unit (COP 3.22) is cheaper to run than gas in 16 of 43 states. Now: does any of this apply to you? The finding is about GAS, and the Census housing survey says exactly how many people that is. Piped gas heats 59.4 million American homes. It is a lot of houses and it is not most of them. Another 44.4 million homes heat with electricity and have NO heat pump, which means resistance heat, and for every one of those a heat pump is a straightforward win: it drinks the same electricity and delivers two to three times the heat. Only 15.1 million homes, about one in nine, already run one. So the country splits nearly in half and the honest version of this page has to tell you which half you are standing in, rather than shout the half that makes the finding sound biggest. And the rest of the case for a heat pump, which we are not going to bury. Everything above compares running cost against a MODERN CONDENSING GAS FURNACE, which is the hardest thing a heat pump can be asked to beat, and we picked it on purpose. Against oil and propane a heat pump wins comfortably. It is also your air conditioner, so if you were buying AC anyway you are replacing two machines with one, which this page does not price. And running cost is not emissions: on a clean grid a heat pump is far better for carbon even where it costs more to run, and that is a real reason to buy one that we cannot put a price on. What is not true is the sentence you will be sold: that a heat pump will cut your heating bill. If you are on resistance heat, it will, and by a lot. Against gas, in most states, it will not.

§ 01 Your numbers

Sets your electricity and gas price from EIA's own published figures. This single choice decides whether a heat pump saves you money or costs you money, which is why it is the first box.
More
Electricity is EIA's Electric Power Monthly for April 2026, residential, by state. Gas is EIA's 2025 annual residential average, converted from dollars per thousand cubic feet to dollars per therm at EIA's heat content of about 1,037 Btu per cubic foot. Your own bill is always the better number and both boxes below are editable.
Set by your state above, from EIA. Override it with the figure off your own bill if you have it.
More
Your bill may show therms or CCF, which are close to the same thing. If you have no gas at all, this comparison is the wrong one for you: see the fuel selector below, because against electric resistance a heat pump wins everywhere.
Seasonal COP, which is HSPF2 divided by 3.412. It is how many units of heat you get per unit of electricity, averaged over a season. It is rated in one specific climate, so treat it as a label rather than a promise about your winter.
More
A higher COP is a better machine and a bigger bill at purchase. The question this page answers is whether the better machine is enough to beat gas where you live, and in most states the honest answer is that even the strongest unit on our list is not.
This changes the answer more than anything else on the page. A modern condensing gas furnace is the hardest thing for a heat pump to beat. Electric resistance is the easiest.
More
We default to the 95% condensing furnace deliberately, because it is the hardest comparison a heat pump can face and we would rather be accused of being hard on heat pumps than soft on them. If you have no gas line, pick electric resistance and watch what happens: the heat pump wins everywhere, usually by a factor of more than two.
Ours, not a statistic. About right for a gas-heated home in a moderate climate.
More
To get your real figure: take your winter therms, divide by 10, and multiply by your furnace's efficiency. It scales the annual saving up and down but it does NOT change which way the comparison goes, because that is decided entirely by the two prices and the two efficiencies.
The capital cost is not what this page is about: put your quote here and we will show you what the running cost does to it.
More
Our HVAC page has the Census survey figures for what US households actually paid for heating and cooling work. The survey does not separate a heat pump from a furnace, though, so there is no heat-pump-specific installed price in it.
To run for a year
$951

Typical range $761$1,189

  • Heat pump, to run for a year$951
  • What you are replacing, for a year$1,295
  • Total$951
See next steps →

§ 02 The return

COP your heat pump must beat here1.74
COP the one you picked actually has2.37
Saved a year (negative = it costs you more)$344
Years to pay back the installn/a

Both prices are EIA's. The breakeven COP is arithmetic on them. The annual heat demand is ours and is a box. The machine price is the middle of 85 retailer listings collected by DOE and NREL. There is no installed price here, and that is a refusal rather than a gap: the one federal file that carries one takes its labour from Homewyse and RSMeans, which model a job rather than observe one, and we will not reprint that as a government figure.

Where the money goes

Heat pump, to run for a year$951
What you are replacing, for a year$1,295

Recommended next steps

Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them, Calcatrice may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only suggest tools that fit your result, and a company can't pay to show up here.

On your state's prices the heat pump is the cheaper machine to run, which is the case a lot of heat pump buyers never get to make. Get three quotes and ask for the HSPF2 in writing, because the whole verdict turns on it.

By the numbers

  • A typical new heat pump (HSPF2 8.1) is cheaper to RUN than a 95% gas furnace in only 4 of the 43 states for which EIA has published a 2025 gas price. In the other 39 it costs more. On the last complete gas year, where all 50 states are in, it is 3 of 50.
    More
    This is running cost, not purchase price, and it is against the hardest comparison a heat pump faces. The breakeven ranges from a COP of 1.74 in Florida, where almost any heat pump wins, to 6.09 in Alaska, where nothing on the market does.
  • Even a top-tier cold-climate heat pump (HSPF2 11, COP 3.22) is only cheaper to run than gas in 16 of 43 states. Buying a stronger machine does not fix it.
    More
    The reason is that the breakeven is set by the ratio of two prices, not by the machine. Where electricity is dear and gas is cheap, no commercially available COP closes the gap.
  • The arithmetic is physics, and you can check it. The COP a heat pump must beat is (electricity $/kWh divided by 3,412 Btu) times (furnace efficiency times 100,000 Btu divided by gas $/therm).
    More
    That is it. There is no model, no assumption and nothing of ours in that formula: it is two EIA prices and two efficiencies. Everything else on this page is commentary.
  • If you have NO GAS LINE, throw all of the above away. Against electric resistance heating a heat pump wins in every state, usually by more than a factor of two, because it is drinking the same electricity and getting two to three times the heat out of it.
    More
    This is the case for a great many homes, particularly in the South, and it is where a heat pump is an unambiguously good buy. Change the fuel selector above and the whole page flips. We would rather show you that than let this read as an argument against heat pumps.
  • A heat pump is also your air conditioner, and this page does not price that. If you were going to buy AC anyway, you are replacing two machines with one.
    More
    That can dominate the whole decision, and it is a capital argument rather than a running-cost one. We compare running costs because that is what can be sourced; the capital comparison depends on your ductwork and your panel, and it cannot be done from a web page.
  • Running cost is not emissions. On a clean grid a heat pump is far better for carbon even in the states where it costs more to run.
    More
    That is a real reason to buy one and it is not a reason we can put a price on, so we are saying it plainly rather than leaving a hole where it should be.
  • 2 more
    • This page does not tell you about tax credits, and you should be suspicious of any page that does without showing you where it got the dates.
      More
      Credits change, they have end dates, and a salesperson quoting you a net price after a credit that has expired is quoting you a price you will not get. We had a confident paragraph about the federal credit here and we removed it, because when we went to check our own citation we found we had deleted it. Everything else on this page is traceable to a federal file we can name. That one was not, so it is not here. Check the credit with the IRS before you let anyone subtract it from a quote.
    • The one thing on this page that could move the count in the heat pump's favour, and we are telling you rather than waiting to be caught: HSPF2 is rated in a single climate zone, and we apply it to Alaska and Florida alike.
      More
      A heat pump does better than its rating in a mild winter and worse in a hard one, because the colder it gets outside the less heat there is to move. Our four winning states (Arkansas, Florida, Georgia and Washington) all have mild winters, and in a mild winter the real seasonal COP runs a little ABOVE the label, so a more careful climate-by-climate model might find a fifth or a sixth. It would also push the cold states further out of reach, which is where 39 of the 43 already are. We could not source a state-by-state seasonal COP from a free federal file, so we use the label, name the limitation, and let you see that it points the one way that would soften our own headline.

Sourced: both prices, from EIA. Electricity is the Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A, residential, by state, April 2026. Gas is EIA's 2025 annual residential average by state. The breakeven COP is arithmetic on those two numbers and the two machines' efficiencies.

More
Our one conversion, named: EIA publishes gas at dollars per thousand cubic feet and we need dollars per therm, so we use EIA's own heat content for residential gas, about 1,037 Btu per cubic foot, giving 10.37 therms per Mcf. It is the only number here not read straight off a price table. Our base case is the version that is KIND to heat pumps, and you should know that before you read the headline again. We price with an April electricity snapshot and an annual gas average, and you heat your house in winter, so neither is a heating-season price. We measured both against EIA's own monthly series. Gas is CHEAPER in the heating season, not dearer: the annual average is inflated by the summer, where the standing charge is spread over almost no gas, and December to March comes in at 89% of it. So we are pricing gas above what it actually costs you to heat with, which flatters the heat pump. April electricity runs 6% above the winter it should be compared with, which cuts the other way but by less. Correct both and a typical heat pump wins in 3 states rather than 4. The finding survives the correction that goes against us, which is the only reason we are willing to print it. These are national seasonal factors applied to every state, not a state-by-state measurement of your winter. Ours: the annual heat demand, which is a box. It scales the saving up and down and it does not change which way the comparison goes, because that is decided entirely by the two prices and the two efficiencies. The machine costs about $4,450. The job does not have a price we are willing to print, and that is a different sentence from "nobody publishes one". DOE and NREL keep a database of efficiency measures, and in it are the listed prices of 85 air-source heat pumps at Home Depot, the AC Outlet, Lowe's and HVAC Direct. The middle of that list is $4,450 for the machine, with the middle half running $2,553 to $5,729. That is what the box costs, and it is a price you could go and pay today. It is not what the job costs. And here is the part we got wrong, twice, and are not going to hide. This page originally said that no free federal source publishes an installed price for a heat pump. That was false. The very same DOE file has an "Installed Cost" column with 24 air-source models in it. We had already downloaded that workbook. We already cite it by name on our kitchen page. We simply never opened the sheet, and then announced that the thing we had not looked for did not exist. Then the fix was wrong too. We said we would take the material price because it was "DOE's own catalogue" and refuse the installed cost because it came from Homewyse and RSMeans. But nothing in that file is DOE's own: DOE compiled other people's listings. And the 24 rows carrying an installed cost turned out to be exactly the Homewyse and RSMeans rows, so we were taking the machine price off the very rows whose labour we were refusing, and calling that a principle. The honest rule is about what kind of number it is, not whose name is on it. A retailer's listed price is an OBSERVED price: Home Depot has a heat pump and a price on it. Homewyse and RSMeans are cost-ESTIMATE services, which do not observe your job, they model it. That is somebody's guess with a logo on it, and reprinting it because it happens to sit inside a government workbook is exactly the laundering we exist to avoid. So we now drop those 24 rows from BOTH columns, because a rule you apply to one and not the other is not a rule. The median does not move either way. The point is that the criterion now separates what it claims to separate. One caveat we will not bury: a listed price is not a transaction. Nobody in that file paid anything. These are prices asked, not prices met, and they are HSPF 7.5 to 8.2, which is the old rating scale. What the Census does and does not have, since we looked. The CONTRACTOR who fits it: 248 product lines for the plumbing, heating and air-conditioning class, and not one of the 248 carries a quantity. Dollars, no jobs, so no price per job. Worth knowing about that class while we are here, because it is the one your installer is counted in: it is only 40.9% actual HVAC work, the rest being plumbers, mechanical contractors and sprinkler fitters. The FACTORY: heat pumps get their own product lines, but the Census collects no unit count for the air-source kind at all, and withholds the dollar figure for the air-source-only line. The WHOLESALER: an $8.4bn line called "wholesale sales of heat pumps", also with no unit count. And the AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY, which our HVAC page is built on: a heat pump, a gas furnace and a boiler are all job code 27, "added or replaced built-in heating equipment", so it can price the job and never the machine. One number did fall out of it. Exactly one heat pump has a published factory-gate price, and it is the water-source kind: $648,262,000 across 382,455 units, so $1,695 each leaving the factory. A water-source unit is a commercial water-loop machine, not the air-source box that would hang beside your house, so we are not going to dress it up as your equipment cost. We mention it because the distance between a number like that and a five-figure quote is mostly ductwork, electrical, distribution and labour, and not the machine.

Sources: EIA, Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A: average retail price of electricity by state, residential (April 2026) · EIA, price of natural gas delivered to residential consumers by state, 2025 annual · Census, American Housing Survey 2023 (national): how 133 million American homes are heated, by system and by fuel · DOE / NREL, National Residential Efficiency Measures Database: the MATERIAL price of 109 air-source heat pumps. We take the machine and refuse the install cost in the same file, because its labour is sourced from Homewyse and RSMeans · Census, 2022 Economic Census, product lines by industry (EC2200NAPCSINDPRD): searched for an installed price and a factory-gate price for a heat pump

How this estimate is calculated

  • Both prices are EIA's own, and the breakeven COP is arithmetic on them rather than a model of ours.
    More
    Electricity: Electric Power Monthly Table 5.6.A, residential, by state, April 2026. Gas: EIA's 2025 annual residential average by state. The formula is (electricity $/kWh / 3,412.14 Btu) x (furnace AFUE x 100,000 Btu / gas $/therm), which is the point at which the two machines cost the same to run.
  • The two price series are not the same period, and rather than hide that we tested whether it changes the answer.
    More
    Electricity is a single month (April 2026); gas is an annual average (2025). So we asked: what if electricity is 15% cheaper than that snapshot AND gas is 25% dearer than its annual average, both stacked in the heat pump's favour? A typical unit still only wins in 20 of 43 states. The verdict survives, which is the only reason we are willing to print it.
  • We compare against a MODERN CONDENSING GAS FURNACE on purpose, because it is the hardest thing for a heat pump to beat.
    More
    Against an older 80% furnace a typical heat pump wins in 10 of 43 states rather than 4. Against oil or propane it wins comfortably. Against electric resistance it wins everywhere. We would rather be accused of being hard on heat pumps than soft on them, and every one of those alternatives is available in the selector.
  • Our one conversion: EIA publishes gas per thousand cubic feet and we need it per therm, so we use EIA's own heat content of about 1,037 Btu per cubic foot (10.37 therms per Mcf).
    More
    It is the only figure on this page that is not read straight off a price table, which is exactly why we are naming it rather than burying it in the arithmetic.
  • The annual heat demand is ours and it does not change the verdict, only the size of the number.
    More
    Which way the comparison goes is decided entirely by the two prices and the two efficiencies. The heat demand scales the annual saving up and down. If you want your real figure: winter therms, divided by 10, times your furnace's efficiency.
  • The MACHINE is priced here ($4,450, the middle of 85 retailer listings that DOE and NREL collected). The INSTALLED job is not, and that is a refusal rather than a gap.
    More
    The same DOE file does carry an installed cost, for 24 models. Every one of those 24 rows gets its labour from Homewyse or RSMeans, which are cost-estimate services: they do not observe a job, they model one. We will not reprint someone else's model as though the government had measured it, so we drop those rows from both columns rather than keep the half that suited us. What we can tell you instead: the box is about $4,450 as a list price, the rest of a quote is ductwork, electrical, distribution and labour, and our HVAC page has the Census survey figures for what US households actually paid for heating and cooling work.

Frequently asked questions

Will a heat pump cut my heating bill?
Against a modern gas furnace, in most states, no. On EIA's own prices a typical new heat pump is cheaper to run than a 95% condensing furnace in only 4 of the 43 states where both prices are published. In the other 39 it costs you more to run. Pick your state above and you will get the answer for where you actually live, which is the thing every article about this refuses to do. But read the next question before you conclude anything, because the comparison changes completely if you do not have gas.
What if I do not have a gas line?
Then everything above is the wrong comparison and a heat pump is very likely an excellent buy. Against electric resistance heating, a heat pump wins in every state, usually by more than a factor of two: it is drinking exactly the same electricity and getting two to three times as much heat out of it. Against oil and propane it also wins comfortably. Change the fuel selector and watch the page flip. The uncomfortable finding on this page is specifically about gas, and gas is a hard thing to beat because it is cheap.
Why does the answer depend so much on the state?
Because the breakeven is a ratio of two prices, and those two prices vary enormously across the country in opposite directions. In Florida electricity is 15.38 cents and gas is $2.46 a therm, so a heat pump only needs a COP of 1.74 to win, which any heat pump manages. In Michigan electricity is 21.39 cents and gas is $1.05, so it needs 5.67, and nothing on the market is close. Same machine, same physics, opposite conclusion. That is why a national average is useless here: it takes two opposite answers and averages them into a middle that is true of nowhere.
Would a better heat pump fix it?
Mostly not, and this surprised us too. A top-tier cold-climate unit at HSPF2 11 has a seasonal COP of about 3.22, and it is still only cheaper to run than gas in 16 of 43 states. The reason is that the breakeven is set by the price ratio, not by the machine: where electricity is expensive and gas is cheap, no commercially available efficiency closes the gap. Buying up the range improves your position and, in most gas-heated states, it does not reverse it.
So are heat pumps a bad idea?
No, and we would rather say that plainly than let this page be quoted as though it said so. A heat pump is also your air conditioner, so if you were buying AC anyway you are replacing two machines with one and the capital arithmetic changes completely. It beats electric resistance everywhere, and oil and propane comfortably. On a clean grid it is far better for carbon even where it costs more to run, which is a real reason to buy one and not one we can put a price on. What is not true is the specific sentence you will be sold, which is that a heat pump will cut your heating bill. Sometimes it will. Against gas, in most states, it will not, and you are entitled to know which case you are in before you sign.

Related calculators