How much does it cost to spay or neuter a dog or cat?
No federal statistic prices a spay. But Maine has paid veterinarians for thousands of them and published the arithmetic: 2,071 surgeries for $215,408 in 2016, 1,246 for $132,620 in 2020. Divide it out and a government paid a vet about $106 per sterilisation, five years running, and the figure barely moves.More
That is not a derivation and not a model. It is two integers the state printed itself, and it is the only observed government payment to a veterinarian for this operation that we have been able to find. Texas and North Carolina publish something different: a schedule rather than an outcome. Texas will pay a flat $300 to spay a dog and $200 to spay a cat; North Carolina caps its reimbursement at $220.80 and $148.17. Now the honest part. All three are subsidised, means-tested programmes: Maine's voucher goes to low-income owners, and North Carolina's statute says the same. They are negotiated, high-volume rates. A private practice is not obliged to match them, and you should not expect it to, and its quote usually includes bloodwork, take-home pain relief and a follow-up that a programme fee need not cover. Treat these as a reference, not a fair-price bound.
A government has paid veterinarians for thousands of these and published exactly what it
paid. Maine's Help Fix ME programme: 2,071 sterilisations for $215,408 in 2016; 1,246 for $132,620 in
2020. Divide it out and the state paid a vet about $106 per animal, five years running, and the
number barely moves. That is not a survey and not a model. It is two integers a state printed itself.More
Texas and North Carolina publish something different: a schedule, not an outcome. Texas's
programme contract sets a flat fee per sterilisation ($300 to spay a dog, $250 to neuter one, $200 to spay a cat,
$125 to neuter one). North Carolina publishes a maximum it will reimburse ($220.80, $177.50, $148.17, $120.11).
Those say what WILL be paid. Maine says what WAS.
We fabricated a number here and we are not going to quietly delete it. The first version of this
page took North Carolina's caps, divided them by 1.5, and told you that was what the state actually paid. The
statute kills it three ways: the average is pooled BY SEX ACROSS BOTH SPECIES, so the dog-spay and cat-spay caps
are measured against the same female average and it cannot be two different numbers at once; the rule says
"average reimbursement ALLOWED", which is not what was paid; and North Carolina never says its caps are set at the
full 150% it is permitted. The figure is withdrawn. Maine publishes what we were trying to reconstruct, and we
should have gone looking for it first.
Now the caveats, and they are not small. All three programmes are MEANS-TESTED: Maine's voucher
goes to low-income owners, and North Carolina's statute restricts it to animals owned by "a low-income person".
Texas's is a two-year PILOT. They are negotiated, high-volume rates. Maine's $106 is a BLENDED average across dogs
and cats, males and females, so it is not a price for one procedure. And a programme fee covers the exam, the
surgery and a rabies shot, where a private quote usually adds bloodwork, take-home pain relief, an e-collar and a
follow-up.
So this is not a fair-price bound, and a vet charging more is not thereby overcharging you. What
it gives you is the one question that actually moves the bill: what is inside the quote?
Your quote
$450
What Maine actually PAID a vet, per sterilisation$106
What Maine actually paid a vet, per sterilisation$106.03
Texas's scheduled flat fee for this procedure$300
Your quote, above what Maine paid$344
Your quote, as a multiple of what Maine paid4.24
Maine's figure is an OUTCOME: total payments divided by surgeries paid, both printed by the state. Texas's and North Carolina's are SCHEDULES: what will be paid, not what was. All three are means-tested subsidy programmes. The industry figures are the Census's and the wages are BLS's. Nothing here is a model of ours, and the one number we derived ourselves has been withdrawn.
Recommended next steps
Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them, Calcatrice may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only suggest tools that fit your result, and a company can't pay to show up here.
Your quote is a long way above what a government has actually paid a vet for this. That is not proof of anything, because private practice includes things a subsidised programme fee does not. But it is worth asking for the itemised list, and worth asking whether a local low-cost or shelter clinic offers the same operation.
Maine paid veterinarians about $106 per sterilisation, five years running, and published the arithmetic itself.More
2016: 2,071 surgeries, $215,408 paid, $104.01 each. 2017: $106.36. 2018: $107.16. 2019: $106.17. 2020: $106.44. It is a blended average across dogs and cats, males and females, and the voucher covers the pre-surgical exam, the sterilisation and a rabies vaccination. It is means-tested: low-income owners only.
Texas will pay a flat $300 to spay a dog and $200 to spay a cat. North Carolina caps its reimbursement at $220.80 and $148.17. Both are schedules, not measurements.More
A schedule says what will be paid; Maine's figure says what was. And note the payee, which we got wrong at first: Texas pays a 'Contractor', which its contract expressly allows to be a shelter or rescue that subcontracts the surgery, and North Carolina pays counties and cities rather than vets. Texas's programme is also a two-year pilot, not a standing arrangement.
No federal statistic can price a spay, and there is no spay code among the 7,120 products the Economic Census classifies.More
The finest grain is a single line, 'surgical treatment of animals', covering a routine neuter and a cancer resection alike. Sector 54 also publishes no hours, so there is not even a vet hourly rate to fall back on. Both halves of a per-procedure price are missing.
Every one of these programmes is means-tested, and that is the biggest limit on comparing them to your quote.More
Maine's voucher goes to low-income owners. North Carolina's statute restricts reimbursement to animals owned by 'a low-income person as defined in G.S. 19A-63(b)'. These are subsidised, high-volume, negotiated rates, and a private practice is under no obligation to match them.
Surgery of all kinds is at least 14.9% of what vets sell. The industry is mostly consultations, tests and non-surgical treatment.More
Of $62.8bn in receipts: routine examinations 26.2%, non-surgical treatment 26.1%, laboratory services 16.0%, surgical treatment 14.9%. We say AT LEAST, because a second surgery line (dental) is withheld by the Census and our first draft counted it as zero. 34,126 establishments, 535,783 employees.
Sourced, and primary: Maine's surgery counts and total payments from its own
programme overview; the Texas flat fees from the state's own open-enrolment contract; the North Carolina maxima
from the Department of Agriculture, and the rule and the payee from the statute itself. The industry figures are
the Economic Census and the wages are BLS. Ours: nothing in any of the prices.More
Why we went hunting for a state at all. Because the federal answer was no, and "no" is
where this site has been wrong eleven times. So rather than write another page explaining an absence, we went
looking for anyone who had committed to a number in public. A subsidy programme cannot exist without one.
We had the payee wrong, and it was in the title. We called this "what the government pays a vet"
and then cited two programmes that do not pay vets. Texas pays a "Contractor", which its own contract defines as
any person or entity awarded one, expressly including shelters and rescues that may subcontract the surgery. North
Carolina pays counties and cities: "Counties and cities eligible for distributions from the Spay/Neuter Account
may receive reimbursement." Only Maine pays the veterinary clinic, by voucher redemption, which is why it now
leads the page.
Why there is no federal price, and it is two reasons rather than the three we first gave. Sector
54's Economic Census has no hours column. And across all 7,120 product codes the Census classifies, there is no
spay code: the finest grain is a single line, "surgical treatment of animals", covering a routine neuter and a
cancer resection alike. We also offered a third reason, that no veterinary line carries a count. True, and
meaningless: the Census collects quantities only for physical goods, and no service anywhere in that file has one.
A property of the file is not a fact about vets, so we withdrew it.
And a figure we corrected in our own disfavour. Surgery of all kinds is AT LEAST 14.9% of what
vets sell. We first wrote "surgery of every kind is only 14.9%", which quietly counted a second, WITHHELD surgery
line (dental) as zero. A withheld cell is not a zero. The true share is higher by an unpublished amount.
A subsidised programme rate is not a market price, and we will not let it pretend to be one.More
These are negotiated, high-volume, means-tested rates. Maine's voucher goes to low-income owners; North Carolina's statute says the same. A private practice is not obliged to match them, and you should not expect it to, and a vet charging above them is not thereby overcharging you.
Maine's $106 is a BLENDED average, not a price for one procedure.More
It is total payments divided by sterilisations paid, across dogs and cats, males and females together. A cat neuter and a dog spay are both inside it. It is what the state paid per sterilisation of any kind, which is a real and useful number and is not the same thing as a price list.
The programme fee covers less than a private quote usually does.More
Maine's fee covers the pre-surgical exam, the sterilisation and a rabies vaccination. A private quote often adds pre-operative bloodwork, take-home pain relief, an e-collar and a follow-up. The gap between $106 and $450 is not all margin. Ask for the itemised list.
We checked four states, not fifty.More
Maine, Texas, North Carolina and New Jersey. Other states run programmes; some publish vouchers rather than fees, some publish nothing, and some may publish better figures than these. We are not claiming these are the only ones that exist, only that they are the ones we opened and read.
The federal figures on this page describe the industry, not the operation.More
34,126 establishments, $62.8bn of receipts, and surgery of all kinds is at least 14.9% of it. None of that prices a spay. It is here to tell you what sort of business you are ringing, not what it will charge you.
Frequently asked questions
How much does it cost to spay a cat?
The most useful number anyone can give you is what a government actually paid, and Maine publishes it: about $106 per sterilisation, five years running, blended across dogs and cats. For a schedule rather than an outcome, Texas will pay a flat $200 to spay a cat and North Carolina will reimburse up to $148.17. A private practice will usually charge you a good deal more than any of those, and that is not automatically wrong: a private quote often includes pre-operative bloodwork, take-home pain relief and a follow-up that a subsidised programme fee need not cover. What these numbers give you is the right question, which is: what is inside the quote?
How much does it cost to neuter a dog or a puppy?
Texas's schedule sets a flat $250 to neuter a dog and $125 for a cat. North Carolina will reimburse up to $177.50 and $120.11. Maine does not split its figure by procedure: it publishes what it paid per sterilisation of any kind, which came to about $106. Put your quote into the box above and the page will show you the gap against all three, then ask your clinic to itemise it, because that is where the difference actually lives.
Why can't you just tell me the average price?
Because no federal statistic measures it, and we will not invent one. The Economic Census has a single product line covering every operation a vet performs, from a routine neuter to a cancer resection, and there is no spay code among the 7,120 products it classifies. So we went and found the governments that have actually paid for these and published the numbers. That is a different thing from an average market price, and we say so rather than blur them together. We did once try to reconstruct an average from North Carolina's rules, got it wrong, and withdrew it. The retraction is on this page, above.
My vet quoted me four times what Maine paid. Are they ripping me off?
Probably not, and we would rather say so than sell you a grievance. Maine's $106 buys a means-tested voucher redeemed at a clinic that has agreed a pre-set fee with the state, covering the exam, the surgery and a rabies shot. Your vet is running a practice with a building, staff, a laboratory and an examination room, and their quote very likely includes bloodwork, pain medication to take home, an e-collar and a follow-up. The useful move is not to wave these figures at them. It is to ask what is inside the number, decide which parts you actually want, and find out whether a local low-cost or shelter clinic will do the parts you do.
